Attali, J. (1985) Noise: The Political Economy of Music. Translated by B. Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Attali’s Noise frames music not as ornamental culture but as a privileged site where political economy becomes audible before it becomes fully visible. Against the conventional treatment of music as autonomous art, he argues that sound is a mode of social organisation, a technology of order, and a prophecy of future economic forms. The opening chapter, “Listening”, establishes this method by insisting that noise is never merely acoustic disturbance: it is a sign of conflict, excess, danger and transformation, because every society must decide which sounds are authorised, regulated, commodified or silenced. Music therefore operates as both mirror and anticipation; it reflects existing power relations while prefiguring new regimes of production, exchange and control. Attali’s case of the musician is especially revealing. Across historical forms, the musician appears ambiguously as priest, entertainer, servant, commodity-producer and prophet, occupying a marginal but structurally decisive position because societies use music to channel violence, organise ritual, distribute pleasure and stabilise collective identity. In the visible pages of the uploaded text, Attali distinguishes major historical logics—sacrificing, representing, repeating and composing—through which music moves from ritual function to spectacle, then to mechanical reproduction and finally towards new forms of creative practice. The decisive argument is that noise marks the boundary where order encounters what it cannot yet absorb. When power captures sound, it converts it into code, property, entertainment or surveillance; when sound exceeds capture, it announces possible social mutation. Music is thus not secondary to economics but one of its laboratories. Attali concludes, in effect, that to listen politically is to hear the future struggling inside the present: every organisation of sound reveals a model of society, and every disturbance discloses the fragile architecture of power.